Residents, artists and heritage advocates say the widespread use of recycled and mismatched stock imagery is quietly distorting how Bendigo's communities are represented in public records, grant applications and digital archives.
4 min read
A growing number of Bendigo residents are raising concerns about the unchecked use of duplicate and replacement images in community documents, heritage databases and publicly funded publications — a practice they say strips local stories of their accuracy and, in some cases, causes lasting damage to cultural records.
The issue has been simmering for months across several community organisations, but it came into sharper focus this week when members of the Dja Dja Wurrung community flagged that at least one regional cultural heritage submission lodged with a Victorian government body contained photographic material that did not correspond to the sites it was meant to document. The image duplication, they said, was not malicious — but the consequences for accurate record-keeping could be significant, particularly given ongoing negotiations over land and heritage protections under the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006.
Community members and representatives from several Bendigo-based organisations describe a pattern that is less about deliberate deception and more about institutional shortcuts. When grant applications must include visual documentation — a standard requirement under programs administered through Creative Victoria and the Regional Arts Victoria grants framework — organisations under deadline pressure sometimes reach for readily available images rather than original photography of the places or people involved.
The Bendigo Neighbourhood House on Mundy Street has been grappling with how to advise its members about best practice when preparing community submissions. Staff there have noted an uptick in inquiries about image licensing and documentation standards over the past six months. Similarly, volunteers with the Bendigo Historical Society, based at the former Mining Exchange building on View Street, say they have encountered digitised records where replacement scans were inserted without notation, creating confusion about provenance when researchers try to cross-reference physical and digital archives.
For Aboriginal community members, the stakes are higher. Duplicate or substituted imagery in heritage documentation can misrepresent sacred sites, undermine the integrity of cultural assessments and weaken the evidentiary basis for heritage overlays. The Victorian Aboriginal Heritage Council, which oversees Registered Aboriginal Parties across the state, maintains standards for documentary evidence, but enforcement of image integrity at the point of submission remains inconsistent.
The ask from affected residents is not complicated. Several people spoken to this week pointed to three practical changes: mandatory metadata tagging for all images included in publicly funded submissions, an independent image verification step before heritage documents are formally lodged, and clearer guidance from funding bodies about what constitutes acceptable visual evidence.
La Trobe University's Bendigo campus, which houses researchers working on regional heritage and community development projects, has the capacity to assist with developing verification frameworks. The university's engagement with local councils and community groups on digital literacy projects — including work connected to the Bendigo Creative Digital Precinct — suggests an existing infrastructure that could be adapted for this purpose.
Regional Arts Victoria's current funding round, with applications closing in August 2026, offers a Community Arts and Cultural Development stream that could theoretically fund a local audit and training initiative. A project of that scope would likely fall in the $20,000 to $50,000 range based on comparable funded projects in the 2024–25 cycle, though any application would need a lead organisation willing to take it on.
For now, residents say awareness is the first step. Community members planning to submit documentation to any state body — whether for a heritage overlay, a planning objection or a cultural grant — are being encouraged to photograph locations and people themselves where possible, retain original image files with date and location metadata intact, and note in any submission where an image is sourced externally. The Bendigo Library on Hargreaves Street can assist with basic digital archiving and metadata guidance through its community support desk. It is a small fix, but for communities whose histories depend on accurate records, it is not a small matter.
Spread the word
About this article
Published by The Daily Bendigo
Daily brief
Free, in your inbox before 7am. Weekdays.
